Electronic Health Records (EHR) - Qualifying
for Reimbursement Payments Under the Medicare and
Medicaid from Title XIII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 What does this bill mean to the typical
chiropractor? You probably have heard something about
receiving 44K in stimulus money. Most likely some software company, a
speaker at a convention, or one of your friends has told you that in
order to get your 44K, you will need to buy right away, otherwise, you
won't get your share of the stimulus money. Most doctors want to
know how to qualify. According to the latest documentation, there are a
number of things combined to allow a chiropractor to qualify for the
stimulus money. - Must be seeing more than 30% Medicare
patients.
- Must be using a "certified system" (Certification not
yet confirmed).
- Must be able to demonstrate meaningful
use (who knows what that means).
Number 1 alone eliminates
a large number of chiropractors. The other items might be possible, but
you must consider if spending a large amount of money on software is
right for your practice, with or without stimulus money. Would would
be best for your business? Initially, we were excited when the
President announced that stimulus funds would go towards EMR systems.
However, when the 2000 page stimulus report was released and we reviewed
the sections reporting on EMR we discovered it was very vague on the
topic of how payment would be made to doctors. It's hard to answer
questions when the bill itself is vague. It would be nice if other
vendors who are promising stimulus refunds list how they are going to
have chiropractors meet the requirements by using their software. They
seem to all have a lot of talk but they don't have any specific
information. They would need to provide documentation showing all the
regulations explaining which certification is needed for a product to
qualify. And where is their certification certificate? Does
certification really mean anything if you'll never qualify as a
chiropractor anyway. A recent search on the CCHIT* (most common
certification at this time for large EMR products) website, indicated there
are NO Chiropractic products with the certification. Here
is a very important point on certification: Today
the certification is the same cost and has the same feature requirements
whether the software is designed for a large hospital or a small
specialized practice. It should be easy to realize the needs of those
two software products are very different. Shouldn't the certification
requirement process and cost for these two types of vendors also be
different? After all, a major benefit for having "certified
software" is to help with compatibility between. Without a unique
certification for each product it may mean many of the specialty
products won't become certified and doctors will have incompatibility
with patients' primary doctors' EMR/EHR systems for years to come. Exactly
what is the criteria? Every one of the stimulus
incentives hinged on practices adopting "meaningful use" of the EMR
systems in question. This without a doubt is the hitch Up until December
2009, "meaningful use" had not been undefined!
In other words,
you could never receive the money unless you ended up using an EMR that
met a certain set of requirements!
It didn't help when this
past December the suggested rules regarding "Meaningful Use" ended up
being 556 pages long! Inside the 556 pages there are a total of 25
standards your practice must satisfy in order to attain
meaningful use. Here is a summary: 1- Objective: Use computer
physician order entry (CPOE) Measure: CPOE is used for at least 80
percent of all orders
2 -Objective: Implement drug-drug,
drug-allergy, drug- formulary checks Measure: The EP has enabled
this functionality
3 - Objective: Maintain an up-to-date problem
list of current and active diagnoses based on ICD-9-CM or SNOMED CT®
Measure: At least 80 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP have
at least one entry or an indication of none recorded as structured data
4 - Objective: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions
electronically (eRx) Measure: At least 75 percent of all permissible
prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using
certified EHR technology
5- Objective: Maintain active
medication list Measure: At least 80 percent of all unique patients
seen by the EP have at least one entry (or an indication of "none" if
the patient is not currently prescribed any medication) recorded as
structured data
6- Objective: Maintain active medication allergy
list Measure: At least 80 percent of all unique patients seen by
the EP have at least one entry (or an indication of "none" if the
patient has no medication allergies) recorded as structured data
7 - Objective: Record demographics. Measure: At least 80 percent of
all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital
have demographics recorded as structured data
8 - Objective:
Record and chart changes in vital signs Measure: For at least 80
percent of all unique patients age 2 and over seen by the EP, record
blood pressure and BMI; additionally, plot growth chart for children age
2 to 20
9 - Objective: Record smoking status for patients
13-years-old or older Measure: At least 80 percent of all unique
patients 13-years-old or older seen by the EP "smoking status" recorded
10 - Objective: Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR as
structured data Measure: At least 50 percent of all clinical lab
tests results ordered by the EP or by an authorized provider of the
eligible hospital during the EHR reporting period whose results are in
either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in
certified EHR technology as structured data
11 - Objective:
Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality
improvement, reduction of disparities, research, and outreach
Measure: Generate at least one report listing patients of the EP with a
specific condition
12 - Objective: Report ambulatory quality
measures to CMS or the States. Measure: For 2011, an EP would
provide the aggregate numerator and denominator through attestation as
discussed in section II.A.3 of this proposed rule. For 2012, an EP would
electronically submit the measures are discussed in section II.A.3. of
this proposed rule.
13 - Objective: Send reminders to patients
per patient preference for preventive/ follow-up care Measure:
Reminder sent to at least 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the
EP that are 50 and over
14 - Objective: Implement five clinical
decision support rules relevant to specialty or high clinical priority,
including for diagnostic test ordering, along with the ability to track
compliance with those rules Measure: Implement five clinical
decision support rules relevant to the clinical quality metrics the EP
is responsible for as described further in section II.A.3
15 -
Objective: Check insurance eligibility electronically from public and
private payers Measure: Insurance eligibility checked electronically
for at least 80 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP
16 - Objective: Submit claims electronically to public and private
payers. Measure: At least 80 percent of all claims filed
electronically by the EP
17 - Objective: Provide patients with
an electronic copy of their health information (including diagnostic
test results, problem list, medication lists, and allergies) upon
request Measure: At least 80 percent of all patients who request an
electronic copy of their health information are provided it within 48
hours
18 - Objective: Provide patients with timely electronic
access to their health information (including lab results, problem list,
medication lists, allergies) Measure: At least 10 percent of all
unique patients seen by the EP are provided timely electronic access to
their health information
19 - Objective: Provide clinical
summaries to patients for each office visit Measure: Clinical
summaries provided to patients for at least 80 percent of all office
visits
20 - Objective: Capability to exchange key clinical
information (for example, problem list, medication list, allergies, and
diagnostic test results), among providers of care and patient authorized
entities electronically Measure: Performed at least one test of
certified EHR technology's capacity to electronically exchange key
clinical information
21 - Objective: Perform medication
reconciliation at relevant encounters and each transition of care
Measure: Perform medication reconciliation for at least 80 percent of
relevant encounters and transitions of care
22 - Objective:
Provide summary care record for each transition of care and referral
Measure: Provide summary of care record for at least 80 percent of
transitions of care and referrals
23 - Objective: Capability to
submit electronic data to immunization registries and actual submission
where required and accepted Measure: Performed at least one test of
certified EHR technology's capacity to submit electronic data to
immunization registries
24 - Objective: Capability to provide
electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and
actual transmission according to applicable law and practice
Measure: Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology's
capacity to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public
health agencies (unless none of the public health agencies to which an
EP or eligible hospital submits such information have the capacity to
receive the information electronically)
25 - Objective: Protect
electronic health information maintained using certified EHR technology
through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities
Measure: Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with
the requirements under 45 CFR 164.308 (a)(1) and implement security
updates as necessary 35 years of chiropractic experience and after
consulting with 1500+ offices,
the majority of these 25 criteria do not
(and should not) pertain to chiropractic. There just isn't an EMR that can promise stimulus money
for the practicing chiropractor. Recently the Medicare
service provider (Palmetto GBA) issued the company's first Quarter
findings regarding Medical Reviews they've recently been performing.
Although Palmetto is just one of many companies that administer claims
for Medicare, their results reflect tendencies throughout the
chiropractic profession and legibility, yes legibility was one of their
top 10 findings. Your current patient treatment records must be
quickly read and understood by a third-party. As a profession,
chiropractors need to get their act together right away, not just for
Medicare, but also for every third party payer. Fortunately Quixote's SOAP Notes are easy to use, legible, and in your own words!
|